top of page

Dialogue Between Spatiality And Movement

In today's class we expressed our thoughts and our future directions. Since the first class we have been relating every task and activity with Jane Banette's passage. I had highlighted some words and phrases which I took along my journey. The thought process can be described through my posters below:

I arranged all my materials in a specific way to make them look like the interpretation of "A flexible space within a rigid body".

Even while what passes for architectural design nowadays frequently amounts to nothing more than a manipulation of geometric spatial conceptions, the experience of architecture is never purely spatial. In fact, the environment we live in is full with sensations and feelings that result from our physical activities and interactions with it. The mobility of our embodied consciousness entails time, and perception is never merely a passive receiver.

Taking Jane Benett’s passage all along this journey was very interesting. All workshops and activities were performed in order understand the context and develop ideas.

Moreover, the writer merely interpreted the scenario as an articulation of various heterogeneous elements. The passage was about connecting the dots and assembling them as a whole.


In addition, the interaction between the internal elements with external context is discussed in the passage. All the elements together were capable of assembling coherence or harmony in a unified system of meaning.

The recognition of space and form depends upon the perception of an individual i.e it relies on the visible aspect and our visual perception.A critical analysis of architectural thought within the context of architectural philosophy is conducted. We identify key elements in the framework of architectural thought. Problem formulation. There are dynamic changes occurring in the architectural process.


Both real-world and theoretical architectural issues have rekindled interest in the critical approach to professional thinking in architecture. These issues require sharp reasoning and efficient task management. It follows that applying the concepts of critical thinking to professional architectural thought is crucial. Doing so should pave the way for the understanding of critical thinking in architectural theory and practice.


Comentarios


bottom of page