After participation, collaboration and conversation on various topics there were certain outcomes which can be collectively represented and linked. Critical thinking led to various questions and their answers.
in the previous activity we were handed a passage which we had to read and graphically represent it.
Everyone had a distinctive outcome in accordance to their perception.
RECONFIGURING
According to me it was basically the reconfiguration of an aspect through co-affective encounters with artworks. The arrow represent entering a state having some intellectual capacity but with certain encounter you mold or enhance your knowledge and the outcome is more reliable and authentic.
One can always gain something through the knowledge given by others. Self analyzing and self assessment is a great technique to evolve.
How can our philosophy produce an art? How can we reach insights through one another?
A critical analysis of architectural thought within the context of architectural philosophy is conducted. We identify key elements in the framework of architectural thought. Problem formulation. There are dynamic changes occurring in the architectural process.
Both real-world and theoretical architectural issues have rekindled interest in the critical approach to professional thinking in architecture. These issues require sharp reasoning and efficient task management. It follows that applying the concepts of critical thinking to professional architectural thought is crucial. Doing so should pave the way for the understanding of critical thinking in architectural theory and practice.
Comments